Product Liability Minnesota Lawyer

Home | Contact Us   

Why Brown? | Attorney Profiles | Ask A Lawyer | Useful Links

Practice Areas

 

Automobile Accidents

Wrongful Death

Medical Malpractice

Premises Liability

Product Liability

Foodborne Illness

Traumatic Brain Injury

 

 

 

 

Product Liability

 

If you've been injured by a defective product, we can help. The attorneys at the Brown Law Offices have represented both plaintiffs and defendants in a number of product liability cases. Today, we work on behalf of injury victims.

Our experience helping those injured by defective products is broad. We've worked on cases involving injuries sustained by the use of commercial forklifts, cement pumper trucks, Halloween costume accessories, and various power equipment.


Most products cases are tried before a jury in an attempt to demonstrate  that a particular good contained a defect that resulted in injury to the user. Expert witnesses are utilized in almost every case, as proof is often highly technical. The choice of an expert often determines the outcome of the case.


Typical experts in a product liability case may include engineering psychologists (human factors), mechanical engineers, economists, annuitists, and vocational rehabilitation specialists. Of course, this list is not exclusive. Other experts may called upon for opinions and testimony as needed.  


Product liability cases require lawyers to both educate and advocate. They are not low budget cases. Consequently, good attorneys will sit down with you to discuss your potential claim and conduct an initial investigation before determining whether to devote substantial time and resources to your case. 


Three legal theories are certain to arise, with the potential for dozens of others. Most often, theories of negligence, strict liability, and the breach of a warranty are invoked against a product maker or distributor.


The following items prove helpful in proving a Plaintiff's case, whether a failure to warn, defective design, or failure to guard claim:
 

> Product advertising information, such as ads and brochures;
> Sales and production information;
> Blueprints, plans, schematics, and diagrams of the product;
> Copies of all warnings that appear on the product;
> "State of the art" standards in the industry;
> Interviews with other users;
> Documentation relating to design, manufacture, or safety;
> Information concerning prior injuries with the product;
> Maintenance records;
> Safety considerations and studies; and
> Regulations, such as ANSI or OSHA.


Much of this information is gathered during the formal discovery process that is required during the lawsuit, while other details may be obtained from different sources by the lawyer prior to commencing suit.


Product liability actions are fought with a vigorous and capable defense. Companies are willing to devote the resources necessary to defend these actions. Valid defenses include: comparative fault (user more than 49% at fault for own injuries); assumption of a known risk; misuse; alteration or modification of the product; use of the product for unintended purpose; and a state of the art product.

 

  © 2005 Brown Law Offices, LLC | ^ Top                             
 

 

We do not have an attorney-relationship with you. The information on this web site should not be considered legal advice. By responding to your request for information via telephone or e-mail we do not intend to create an attorney-client relationship with you. Any information we provide to you should not be considered legal advice and you should not rely on it as if it were. An attorney-client relationship between you and our firm may be formed only when we agree to represent you and receive a signed retainer agreement from you.